Detail of Publication
Text Language | English |
---|---|
Authors | Masakazu Iwamura, Tomokazu Sato and Koichi Kise |
Title | What Is the Most Efficient Way to Select Nearest Neighbor Candidates for Fast Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search? |
Journal | Proc. 14th International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2013) |
Pages | pp.3535-3542 |
Location | Sydney, Australia |
Reviewed or not | Reviewed |
Presentation type | Poster |
Month & Year | December 2013 |
DOI | 10.1109/ICCV.2013.439 |
- Note
- C and P in Table 1 are typos for c and p, respectively.
- Experimental result of the following paper [a] that shows BDH was worse than IMI is theoretically wrong because BDH is a generalization of IMI and never gets worse than IMI.
[a] Heo, J.-P.; Lin, Z.; Shen, X.; Brandt, J. & Yoon, S.-E.
Shortlist Selection with Residual-Aware Distance Estimator for K-Nearest Neighbor Search
Proc. CVPR, IEEE, 2016, pp.2009-2017
- Following files are available.
- 2839d535.pdf (932.5KB)
- Cover.png (19.8KB)
- MIRU2014_invited_BDH2014.7.28_rev.pptx (2.6MB)
- poster.pdf (16.8MB)
- Entry for BibTeX
@InProceedings{Iwamura2013, author = {Masakazu Iwamura and Tomokazu Sato and Koichi Kise}, title = {What Is the Most Efficient Way to Select Nearest Neighbor Candidates for Fast Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search?}, booktitle = {Proc. 14th International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV 2013)}, year = 2013, month = dec, pages = {3535--3542}, DOI = {10.1109/ICCV.2013.439}, location = {Sydney, Australia} }